Journal cover Journal topic
Mechanical Sciences An open-access journal for theoretical and applied mechanics
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 1.015
IF1.015
IF 5-year value: 1.403
IF 5-year
1.403
CiteScore value: 1.9
CiteScore
1.9
SNIP value: 0.588
SNIP0.588
IPP value: 0.94
IPP0.94
SJR value: 0.271
SJR0.271
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 20
Scimago H
index
20
h5-index value: 13
h5-index13
Supported by
Logo Library of Delft University of Technology Logo NWO
Affiliated to
Logo iftomm
Volume 4, issue 2
Mech. Sci., 4, 345–356, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-4-345-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Advances in compliant mechanisms: theories, tools and...

Mech. Sci., 4, 345–356, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-4-345-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 15 Oct 2013

Research article | 15 Oct 2013

New empirical stiffness equations for corner-filleted flexure hinges

Q. Meng1, Y. Li1,2, and J. Xu1 Q. Meng et al.
  • 1Department of Electromechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Av. Padre Tomas Pereira, Taipa, Macao SAR, China
  • 2School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China

Abstract. This paper investigates the existing stiffness equations for corner-filleted flexure hinges. Three empirical stiffness equations for corner-filleted flexure hinges (each fillet radius, r, equals to 0.1 l; l, the length of a corner-filleted flexure hinge) are formulated based on finite element analysis results for the purpose of overcoming these investigated limitations. Three comparisons made with the existing compliance/stiffness equations and finite element analysis (FEA) results indicate that the proposed empirical stiffness equations enlarge the range of rate of thickness (t, the minimum thickness of a corner-filleted flexure hinge) to length (l), t/l (0.02 ≤ t/l ≤ 1) and ensure the accuracy for each empirical stiffness equation under large deformation. The errors are within 6% when compared to FEA results.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation