Mechanical Sciences
Mechanical Sciences
Mechanical Sciences
Articles | Volume 11, issue 1
Articles | Volume 11, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-11-125-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-11-125-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 11, issue 1
Research article
 | 
23 Apr 2020
Research article |  | 23 Apr 2020

Code-to-code verification for thermal models of melting and solidification in a metal alloy: comparisons between a Finite Volume Method and a Finite Element Method

Anna M. V. Harley, Sagar H. Nikam, Hao Wu, Justin Quinn, and Shaun McFadden

Viewed

Total article views: 4,823 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,261 500 62 4,823 53 49
  • HTML: 4,261
  • PDF: 500
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 4,823
  • BibTeX: 53
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Apr 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Apr 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,267 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,197 with geography defined and 70 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 21 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
This paper examines a code-to-code verification between two thermal models. One used a non-commercial code; the other a commercial. A point heat source was applied to one end of a cylindrical geometry. Melting and re-solidfying of a 316 L stainless steel alloy was considered. Temperature dependent material properties and latent heat were included. Mesh independency was achieved. Positive agreement of thermal histories, temperature profiles, melt pool depth and maximum temperature along the rod.
Read more
Share